Labour councillors demand more scrutiny of Barnet Council’s plans for North Finchley By Simon Allin, Local Democracy Reporter
The Arts Depot site in North Finchley forms a key part of Barnet Council’s regeneration plans (credit Google)
A political row has erupted at Barnet Council after opposition councillors held up a decision on a Finchley regeneration deal they dubbed a “blank cheque for developers”.
The borough’s Labour group called for more detail on plans to redevelop sites in North Finchley town centre – including the library, Arts Depot and two car parks – and claimed there had been a failure to engage with residents.
Council leader Dan Thomas hit back, accusing Labour of playing politics over a scheme that will “greatly improve North Finchley” and pointing out that the group backed a regeneration agreement for the town centre in 2018.
Labour housing and growth spokesperson Ross Houston said his group had accepted a supplementary planning document (SPD) setting out development guidelines for the town centre, but it had reservations about the scheme at the time and expected more details to be published.
The regeneration deal is designed to provide new homes and improve the shopping experience in the town centre. During a meeting of the housing and growth committee on 13th September, a report asked councillors to approve the site assembly and land agreement for the scheme. It includes the proposed sale to developer Regal of the Arts Depot, North Finchley Library, and Lodge Lane and Woodhouse Road car parks.
But Labour warned the agreement would start the process for the sites to be sold before any detail about the plans had been published. Speaking after the meeting, Cllr Houston said: “This agreement is like signing a blank cheque to the developers. Key sites will be sold off and yet no-one has any idea what the town centre will look like and what will happen there.
“The council makes grand claims that they are ‘delivering the community’s ambitions for North Finchley’, and the regeneration will be ‘in partnership with communities’, but it’s complete nonsense. The community has been told virtually nothing about the plans, and the stakeholders’ partnership board has never been set up.”
The supplementary planning document published in 2018 reveals blocks up to twelve storeys high could be built in parts of the town centre. But Cllr Houston said the council should not be handing over public assets without “putting robust conditions in place to ensure that the SPD is the absolute limit for things like height”.
He added: “The Conservatives do not stand up to developers and they wave through scheme after scheme with mega-dense, high-rise towers and insufficient community benefit. We cannot rely on them to put the community first, so until more detail about the height and scale of new buildings in the regeneration is published and the community is consulted properly, we will not support this agreement.”
Labour referred a decision on the agreements up to full council, meaning they are set to be debated again during a meeting on Tuesday, 19th October.
Council leader Dan Thomas said: “The council originally entered into an agreement for the regeneration of North Finchley in 2018, which was supported by local Labour councillors.
“Indeed, Cllr Houston was at the meeting and voted for the proposal. Cllr Houston spoke in favour of the scheme at that meeting – showing that his recent statement and new stance on the project is nothing but politics and misinformation.
“The project will greatly improve North Finchley, creating a greener, more resident and business-friendly town centre.
“Councillors have simply been asked to approve a change of developer for the project. Regal, the new developer, has delivered successful projects, including a number in Labour-run Hackney.
“This forced delay from Labour simply highlights their willingness to play politics with the improvement of our borough, while they sit silently as Labour mayor Sadiq Khan proposes out-of-character tower blocks across Barnet.”
A council spokesperson said: “The process of establishing the partnership board awaited the appointment of a developer first. Unfortunately this was delayed when the previous potential developer withdrew from the scheme. We will work with the new partner to set up the partnership board as soon as their role is confirmed, subject to the council meeting on 19th October.
“As agreed in 2018, the council will work with the developer on the design of the scheme and subject to a satisfactory scheme receiving planning permission, is agreeing to sell to the scheme at best value a number of council properties which cannot be included in any compulsory purchase order, as they are already owned by the council.”
No news is bad news
Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.
The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.
If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.
Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.
Monthly direct debit
Annual direct debit
£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else. £84 annual supporters get a print copy by post and a digital copy of each month's before anyone else.