North London Waste Authority refuses to provide an opening date as it becomes clear 2027 deadline will be missed, reports Sebastian Mann, Local Democracy Reporter

Progress on the construction of the new Edmonton incinerator is continuing to drag amid a series of local and international challenges.
The redevelopment at Edmonton Eco Park, which will replace the existing, ageing waste-burning facility has been delayed, overseers say.
They have pointed to Brexit, the war in Ukraine, and high interest rates impacting the cost of raw construction materials.
The incinerator was intended to be up and running by 2027.
No fresh timelines for the project have been made publicly available, but the North London Waste Authority (NLWA) – which is guiding the project – says “construction progress continues to be made”.
The NLWA is controlled by councillors from Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Hackney, Haringey, Islington and Waltham Forest, and is responsible for disposing of waste from the seven boroughs.
Construction firm Acciona is still facing “challenges,” NLWA chair Clyde Loakes has admitted. Last year, it was reported the firm had faced “continued” delays in bringing in subcontractors for the next stage of development.
Cllr Loakes, who also serves as the deputy leader of Waltham Forest Council, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: “The delivery of the energy recovery facility has not stopped – construction progress continues to be made, with over 200 workers on site.
“The subcontractors engaged by Acciona have consistently demonstrated excellent competency throughout the project. The civil works are largely complete and work to install the first two boilers and the steelwork for the turbines and flue gas treatment continues.
“However, as we have consistently reported publicly, there are challenges being faced by Acciona and the programme is delayed.
“Factors such as energy and raw material price shocks following the outbreak of the Ukraine war, high interest rates, and Brexit have impacted the construction industry.”
But despite the reassurances, campaigners against the scheme fear it is in “serious disarray”.
Carina Millstone, with the Stop Edmonton Incinerator Now Coalition, said: “The NLWA’s stubborn refusal to release information about the delays in the building of the new incinerator suggests to us that the relationship with Acciona has irretrievably broken down, no doubt at a hefty cost to the councils.
“We now believe the new incinerator will never be built.”
A total of £66.5million has been allocated to the project from the Heat Networks Investment Project, a government-funded scheme aimed at increasing the number of networks in England and Wales.
It was reported in 2023 that the budget for the incinerator, as well as other new waste facilities at Edmonton Eco Park collectively dubbed ‘North London Heat and Power Project’, had risen from £1.2billion to around £1.5bn.
At a cabinet meeting in June, top councillors in Haringey agreed they would shelve their plans to pipe heat from the incinerator, citing “economic turbulence” and the need for “prudent” management.
Concerns have also been raised about the potential impact of the incinerator on air quality in North London.
North Middlesex University Hospital, which serves Enfield and Haringey, saw 14,587 children with breathing difficulties admitted in 2024, the highest of any hospital in London and 220% higher than the London average.
Cllr Loakes said the NLWA was following the “well-established scientific evidence that modern and well-run facilities do not pose a significant risk to public health”.
He said: “By far the biggest source of air pollution is road traffic – even at its absolute peak level, the new facility would be responsible for just 0.52% of local particulates and 2.93% of NOx, compared to 30% from road traffic.
“More than 35 facilities have been given consent since we submitted our application, and only three of them will have emissions cleaning technology as good as ours.”
He said the incinerator will lead to the “best environmental outcomes” and the “best value for our council taxpayers”.
He added: “Councils must dispose of all the rubbish our residents throw away, so we need to focus on solutions to put an end to unnecessary waste, in particular plastic.”
The chair also said the NLWA was “starting to see some progress, with commitments to making producers pay for the waste they create and a deposit return scheme both showing steps in the right direction”.
The NLWA previously said that while it expects “people will recycle more and produce less waste in the future” there will also be “more people producing waste, which means we need to plan for increasing volumes of waste”.
No news is bad news
Independent news outlets like ours – reporting for the community without rich backers – are under threat of closure, turning British towns into news deserts.
The audiences they serve know less, understand less, and can do less.
If our coverage has helped you understand our community a little bit better, please consider supporting us with a monthly, yearly or one-off donation.
Choose the news. Don’t lose the news.
Monthly direct debit
Annual direct debit


£5 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else, £10 per month supporters get a digital copy of each month’s paper before anyone else and a print copy posted to them each month. £50 annual supporters get a digital copy of each month's paper before anyone else. £84 annual supporters get a print copy by post and a digital copy of each month's before anyone else.
More information on supporting us monthly
More Information about donations